← All pages

Sublicense

Definition: A clause that grants — or restricts — the right to pass a license on to a third party (to “sublicense” it). It shows up two ways here: a platform granting itself the right to sublicense user content to others, or a platform restricting developers from sublicensing their API access onward. Risk level: When a platform grants itself the right to sublicense your content, it can pass usage rights to other companies without asking you again — multiplying who can use your content beyond the platform itself. When a platform instead restricts sublicensing by developers, it’s the opposite: a control that keeps reuse rights locked to the platform alone.

Platforms Using This Clause

Common Wording

(d) sell, rent, lease, sublicense, distribute, redistribute, syndicate, create derivative works of, assign or otherwise transfer or provide access to, in whole or in part, the Licensed Material to any third party except as expressly permitted in this Agreement… — X, Other (Developer Agreement, Restrictions on Use), 2024-02-21 — a restriction on developers, not a grant X takes for itself.

By submitting, posting or displaying Content on or through the Services, you grant us a worldwide, non-exclusive, royalty-free license (with the right to sublicense) to use, copy, reproduce, process, adapt, modify, publish, transmit, display, upload, download, and distribute such Content… — X, Terms of Service, 2024-02-21 (present, with AI-training language added 2024-10-17, unchanged in substance through 2026-01-16) — here X grants itself the sublicensable right over user Content.

sell advertising, sponsorships, or promotions on any page or screen that contains YouTube API Data unless other data, content, or material not obtained from YouTube appears on the same page and offers enough independent value to justify such sales if the YouTube API Data were removed… — YouTube, Other (API Services Terms of Service), 2022-07-11 — note: this snippet is tagged sublicense in the source data but the word does not appear anywhere in the captured text (verified). It actually covers commercial-use/ad-sale restrictions on API Clients. Flagged as a likely keyword/window-alignment mismatch (see that page’s Overview) rather than a confirmed sublicensing clause.

b) sell, rent, lease, sublicense, distribute, redistribute, syndicate, create derivative works of, assign or otherwise transfer or provide access to, in whole or in part, the Licensed Material to any third party except as expressly permitted in this Agreement… — Twitter, Other (Developer Agreement, Restrictions on Use), 2022-07-11 — the direct historical predecessor of X’s near-identical restriction above; a restriction on developers, not a grant Twitter took for itself.

By submitting, posting or displaying Content on or through the Services, you grant us a worldwide, non-exclusive, royalty-free license (with the right to sublicense) to use, copy, reproduce, process, adapt, modify, publish, transmit, display and distribute such Content… — Twitter, Terms of Service, 2022-09-05 (present unchanged in substance through 2023-10-11) — Twitter grants itself the sublicensable right over user Content, same as X’s later Terms of Service.

You grant us a non-exclusive, transferable, sublicensable, royalty-free, worldwide license to: host, use, distribute, modify, run, copy, publicly perform or display, translate, and create derivative works of any information, data, and other content made available by you or on your behalf… — Facebook, Other (Platform Terms, “Your License to Us”), 2022-07-11 — Meta grants itself the sublicensable right over App-routed data, the same direction as X’s and Twitter’s Terms of Service (not their “Other” pages).

the User who posted such Submitted Contents shall be deemed to have granted LINE a worldwide, perpetual, royalty-free license (including… the right to sublicense such usage rights to other third parties working together with LINE), to use such Contents for services and/or promotional purposes. — LINE, Terms of Service, 2022-07-11 (dataset stops capturing this clause under this keyword from 2023-10-02 onward, but confirmed still present in the live document via raw cross-check — see that platform page’s Overview) — LINE grants itself the right to sublicense usage rights specifically “to other third parties working together with LINE,” a narrower onward-sublicense scope than X’s/Twitter’s unrestricted “with the right to sublicense.”

Do not sell, share, transfer, or sublicense them to any other party other than your employees or independent contractors in accordance with… — LinkedIn, Other (Developer Agreement, Access Credentials), 2022-07-11 (present in substance throughout 5 scrapes) — a restriction on developers, the same direction as X’s/Twitter’s/Facebook’s “Other” pages: developers cannot pass on their LinkedIn API access credentials to anyone outside their own organization.

You grant to Parler a license to any content posted by you to the Services, including a worldwide, non-exclusive, royalty-free license (with the right to sublicense) to use, copy, reproduce, process, adapt, modify, publish, transmit, display and distribute your content. — Parler, Terms of Service, 2022-07-11 (present in substance across all 28 scrapes through 2026-02-06, confirmed via raw cross-check) — Parler grants itself the sublicensable right over user Content, structurally close to Twitter’s/X’s Terms of Service grant.

The right for Quora to copy, display, transmit, publish, perform, distribute, store, modify, and otherwise use any question you post, and sublicense those rights to others, is perpetual and irrevocable, to the maximum extent permitted by law, except as otherwise specified in this Agreement. — Quora, Terms of Service, 2022-07-11 (present in substance throughout) — Quora grants itself a sublicensable right over posted questions specifically (a separate sentence from the main Content-license clause), explicitly paired with “perpetual and irrevocable” — see Irrevocable.

Spotify may assign any or all of these Terms, and may assign or delegate, in whole or in part, any of its rights or obligations under these Terms. You may not assign these Terms, in whole or in part, nor transfer or sublicense your rights under these Terms to any third party. — Spotify, Terms of Service, 2023-03-24 (present in substance through 2025-10-03) — the restriction direction, structurally distinct from Spotify’s own Content-license clause (which grants Spotify a “sub-licensable” right over User Content — see Royalty-Free): a one-sided “Assignment” clause letting Spotify freely assign its own obligations while banning users from sublicensing their rights under the Terms to anyone else.

Because Tumblr Live is powered by TMG, this means: * Tumblr may have to share certain data with TMG, including but not limited to your username, profile photo, about me, and imprecise geolocation data. TMG may also separately collect additional information directly from you. You understand that TMG is the operator of the Tumblr Live feature and will act as the controller of all the data and content you generate while using Tumblr Live… — Tumblr, Terms of Service, 2022-12-16 (present in substance throughout) — a structurally distinct usage from every other occurrence under this keyword: not a Content-license clause at all, but a third-party data-sharing disclosure naming the operator (TMG) of Tumblr’s livestreaming feature and the exact data categories shared with it.

The licence granted to you under these Terms is limited to a non-transferable licence to use the UpScrolled application on devices that you own or control… You may not transfer, redistribute, or sublicense the UpScrolled application. — UpScrolled, Terms of Service, 2026-02-15 (only scrape in this dataset) — the restriction direction, scoped specifically to a “Mobile Application Terms” clause governing app-store-distributed use, rather than the broader Agreement (contrast with Spotify’s/Tumblr’s Assignment-clause restrictions).

You may not copy, modify, create derivative works, reverse compile, reverse engineer or extract source codes from WeChat Software, and you may not sell, distribute, redistribute or sublicense WeChat or the WeChat Software, except in each case to the extent that we may not prohibit you from doing so under applicable laws or regulations or you have our prior written consent to do so. — WeChat, Terms of Service, 2022-07-11 (present in substance throughout 8 scrapes) — the restriction direction, bundled with an anti-derivative-works and anti-reverse-engineering ban in the same sentence — see Derivative Works.

You must not (or assist others to) directly, indirectly, through automated or other means access, use, copy, adapt, modify, prepare derivative works based upon, distribute, license, sublicense, transfer, display, perform, or otherwise exploit our Services in impermissible or unauthorized manners… — WhatsApp, Terms of Service, 2022-07-11 (present in substance throughout 7 scrapes) — the restriction direction, within the same “Harm To WhatsApp Or Our Users” clause as prepare derivative and automated means — see Automated Means.

Notes & Trends

X is the clearest example of the platform-grants-itself-the-right pattern: its Terms of Service gives X a sublicensable license over everything users post, while the “Other” bundle (the Developer Agreement) goes the other way and restricts developers from sublicensing the API content they receive — X keeps the broad rights for itself while limiting onward distribution by everyone else. Twitter’s Developer Agreement shows this developer-restricting language predates the rebrand essentially unchanged, and Twitter’s Terms of Service shows the platform-grants-itself-the-right side predates it too — X didn’t introduce the sublicensable Content grant, it inherited it from Twitter. The YouTube occurrence is unconfirmed: the captured snippet doesn’t contain the word “sublicense” at all, so treat it as a placeholder pending verification against the full YouTube API Services Terms of Service, not as evidence of a specific sublicensing clause. Facebook’s “Other” page is the first platform where both directions are confirmed in the same document: Meta grants itself a sublicensable right over developer-routed App data (“Your License to Us”) while restricting developers from sublicensing Platform access onward (“Our License to You”) — the same asymmetric pattern X shows across two separate pages, here visible within one. Instagram’s “Other” page shares this pattern verbatim, confirming the Platform Terms are a single Meta-wide document, not drafted separately per app. LINE’s Terms of Service adds a scope limit not seen elsewhere: onward sublicensing is restricted to “third parties working together with LINE,” rather than left open-ended. LinkedIn’s “Other” page adds a fifth confirmed developer-restriction occurrence, narrower than the others since it restricts onward sharing of API Access Credentials specifically, not Content or Platform access broadly. Parler’s Terms of Service returns to the platform-claims-it-for-itself direction, structurally near-identical to Twitter’s/X’s grant, confirmed present across all 28 scrapes via raw cross-check despite reported risk-score fluctuation (see Royalty-Free). Quora’s Terms of Service adds a distinct sub-clause: a separate sublicensable grant specifically over posted questions, paired with “perpetual and irrevocable” language in the same sentence — the first occurrence of this exact pairing under this keyword. Spotify’s Terms of Service shows both directions in one document, like Facebook’s and Instagram’s “Other” pages: its Content-license clause grants Spotify a sublicensable right over User Content, while a separate “Assignment” clause bans users from sublicensing their own rights under the Terms — confirming this asymmetric pattern shows up outside Developer Agreements too. Tumblr’s Terms of Service breaks from every prior pattern here: rather than a Content-license clause in either direction, it’s a third-party data-sharing disclosure for the “Tumblr Live” feature, confirming this concept page tracks the broader “sublicense”-family keyword, not just Content-license clauses. UpScrolled’s Terms of Service returns to the restriction direction, narrowly scoped to its mobile app under app-store distribution terms rather than the whole Agreement. WeChat’s Terms of Service adds another restriction-direction occurrence, bundled with anti-derivative-works and anti-reverse-engineering bans in the same sentence — the same numbered-list pattern as Twitch’s “Don’ts.” WhatsApp’s Terms of Service adds another restriction-direction occurrence, in a detailed “Harm To WhatsApp Or Our Users” clause that also bundles prepare derivative and automated means in the same sentence.