1. What the document is: Meta's general Cookies Policy. It covers authentication, security, advertising/measurement, site-feature, performance, and analytics cookies across "Meta Products" broadly (Facebook, Instagram, Messenger), plus a list of roughly 30 third-party companies (Google, Microsoft, LinkedIn, Twitter/X, Reddit, Pinterest, Adobe, etc.) whose cookies appear on Meta Products.

What this wiki found — complete, every page

AI trainingRoyalty-freeSublicensablePerpetual / irrevocableTransferableDerivative works

Presence facts, not verdicts — each flagged term links to its definition and the exact clause on this page. Absence of a badge means the term isn't currently flagged here, not that the page is risk-free.

Llama API – Trackers Policy

Dataset: GenGA (Generative AI Governance Archive) — 11 AI services, 2025–present

GenGA (Generative AI Governance Archive) is this wiki’s Generative-AI dataset: raw policy snapshots captured by the Open Terms Archive genai-eu project across 11 GenAI providers (ChatGPT, Claude.ai, DeepSeek, Google Generative AI Services, Le Chat, Llama API, Meta AI, Microsoft Copilot, Perplexity, Qwen Chat, xAI). Unlike PGAv2, GenGA has no pre-tagged risk scores — all risk scoring and keyword tagging on these pages is LLM-assigned by direct reading, spanning 2025–present.

Note: This page contains documented policy clauses. Risk assessment is qualitative and context-dependent. For analysis of patterns across platforms, see:

Source: sources/GenGA/Llama API/Trackers Policy/ (raw Markdown captures, Open Terms Archive genai-eu dataset — no pre-tagged JSONL exists for this source) Last updated: 2025-11-11 (only capture in this dataset)

Note on methodology: No pre-computed risk_score/keyword fields exist for this source. Keyword tags on this page are LLM-assigned. Treat as first-pass analysis, not externally verified ground truth. This wiki’s risk-scoring system was retired project-wide on 2026-06-21 (see methodology.md §4) — no page, GenGA included, computes or displays a numeric risk score.

Scope-mismatch note: This capture is Meta’s general Facebook/Instagram cookie policy (discusses Facebook Pages, Messenger, Instagram ad preferences) — it is not specific to the Llama API and does not mention Llama, the Llama API, or any GenAI product by name. Likely a generic Meta corporate cookie policy linked from (rather than written for) the Llama API’s legal page.

Overview

1. What the document is: Meta’s general Cookies Policy. It covers authentication, security, advertising/measurement, site-feature, performance, and analytics cookies across “Meta Products” broadly (Facebook, Instagram, Messenger), plus a list of roughly 30 third-party companies (Google, Microsoft, LinkedIn, Twitter/X, Reddit, Pinterest, Adobe, etc.) whose cookies appear on Meta Products.

2. Input rights / 3. Output restrictions: Not addressed. This is a cookie/tracking disclosure, not a data-rights document.

4. Non-explicit predatory clauses: The advertising-cookie infrastructure is extensive — cross-device ad tracking via _fbp/_fbc, 400-day-lifespan datr/oo identifiers, and off-platform activity tracking via Meta Business Tools/Pixel that works even for logged-out users — but it’s openly disclosed here, consistent with Meta’s known ad-tech stack documented elsewhere for Meta’s other products.

5. Regulatory references: None found.

6. Regional variation: Points to region-specific ad-choice opt-out mechanisms: the Digital Advertising Alliance (US), DAA of Canada, and the European Interactive Digital Advertising Alliance (Europe).

7. Key risk to users: Low-to-moderate, but largely out of scope for this wiki’s Llama-API-specific tracking, since the document never addresses the API product itself. It’s flagged here mainly as a data-quality/scope gap in the source dataset, not as a Llama-API-specific finding.

No AI-training, data-licensing, or feedback-rights clauses found.

Regulatory & Research Context

Llama API was not among the providers directly studied by Davidson et al. (2026) or Pandit et al. (2026) in this batch, and this page’s own scope-mismatch — a generic Meta Facebook/Instagram cookie policy that never mentions Llama or the Llama API by name — is itself a transparency gap of the kind Edwards et al. (2025) associate with the “platformisation paradigm,” where a single corporate-wide policy is repurposed across distinct products rather than tailored to the specific GenAI service users are interacting with.

Changes Summary

Date	What changed
2025-11-11	Baseline and only version captured in this dataset (“Effective December 12, 2023”).

Version History

2025-11-11

Explicit AI clause: NO
Non-explicit predatory: NO
Flagged keywords: (none)

No AI-training or data-licensing clauses found — a general Meta cookie-tracking disclosure unrelated to the Llama API specifically.