1. What the document is: Perplexity's consumer Terms of Service for its website/app AI-powered search engine. The API and Enterprise Pro are covered separately elsewhere on this wiki.
What this wiki found — complete, every page
Presence facts, not verdicts — each flagged term links to its definition and the exact clause on this page. Absence of a badge means the term isn't currently flagged here, not that the page is risk-free.
Perplexity – Terms of Service
Dataset: GenGA (Generative AI Governance Archive) — 11 AI services, 2025–present
GenGA (Generative AI Governance Archive) is this wiki’s Generative-AI dataset: raw policy snapshots captured by the Open Terms Archive
genai-euproject across 11 GenAI providers (ChatGPT, Claude.ai, DeepSeek, Google Generative AI Services, Le Chat, Llama API, Meta AI, Microsoft Copilot, Perplexity, Qwen Chat, xAI). Unlike PGAv2, GenGA has no pre-tagged risk scores — all risk scoring and keyword tagging on these pages is LLM-assigned by direct reading, spanning 2025–present.
Note: This page contains documented policy clauses. Risk assessment is qualitative and context-dependent. For analysis of patterns across platforms, see:
Source: sources/GenGA/Perplexity/Terms of Service/ (raw Markdown captures, Open Terms Archive genai-eu dataset — no pre-tagged JSONL exists for this source)
Last updated: 2026-01-24
Note on methodology: No pre-computed
risk_score/keywordfields exist for this source. Keyword tags and clause analysis on this page are LLM-assigned, using the same rubric/vocabulary as the PGAv2 pages plus new GenAI-specific tags (input license,feedback,ai disclosure). Treat as first-pass analysis, not externally verified ground truth. This wiki’s risk-scoring system was retired project-wide on 2026-06-21 (seemethodology.md§4) — no page, GenGA included, computes or displays a numeric risk score.
Overview
1. What the document is: Perplexity’s consumer Terms of Service for its website/app AI-powered search engine. The API and Enterprise Pro are covered separately elsewhere on this wiki.
2. Input rights: Major finding — Perplexity’s Content license is the broadest one found among this dataset’s chat/search-AI providers. It reads more like a social-media platform’s license than ChatGPT’s or Claude.ai’s narrower, training-specific grants: “you grant us a license to access, use, host, cache, store, reproduce, transmit, display, publish, distribute, and modify Your Content to operate, improve, promote and provide the Services… these rights and licenses are royalty free, transferable, sub-licensable, worldwide and irrevocable (for so long as Your Content is stored with us).” Stacking all five qualifiers — royalty-free, transferable, sublicensable, worldwide, irrevocable — in one clause is unusual for a GenAI provider; most limit Input/Output rights to “operate and improve the Services.”
3. Output restrictions: Users must disclose AI involvement and credit the source. They “may not (i) publish any Output generated by the Services without clearly citing the Services, or (ii) misrepresent the source of any Output or the fact that it was generated by artificial intelligence.”
4. Non-explicit predatory clauses: The Feedback clause (§6.3) doesn’t just license feedback — it transfers ownership: “All Feedback becomes the sole and exclusive property of the Company… You hereby assign to the Company any and all right, title and interest… that you may have in and to any and all Feedback.” This matches the assignment structure in Perplexity’s Developer Terms.
5. Regulatory references: None in this document — regulatory citations appear in the separate Privacy Policy/DPA instead.
6. Regional variation: None. Governing law is California, with a JAMS arbitration clause and a class-action waiver (30-day opt-out window) — a standard U.S. consumer contract with no EU-specific terms here.
7. Key risk to users: Moderate-to-high compared to other chat-AI providers in this dataset. The fully-stacked license — royalty-free, transferable, sublicensable, worldwide, irrevocable — combined with the Feedback assignment, makes this one of the broader rights grabs among the 11 GenAI providers tracked. It’s still narrower in purpose (limited to operating, improving, and promoting the Services) than the maximal “for any purpose” grants some PGAv2 social-media platforms use.
Flagged Keywords & Risks (LLM-assigned)
input license— “these rights and licenses are royalty free, transferable, sub-licensable, worldwide and irrevocable (for so long as Your Content is stored with us).” Why it matters: this is the broadest, most fully-stacked Content license among the chat/search AI providers in this dataset.feedback— “All Feedback becomes the sole and exclusive property of the Company… You hereby assign to the Company any and all right, title and interest… in and to any and all Feedback.” Why it matters: this transfers ownership, not just a license to use — matching the Developer Terms.ai disclosure— Users may not “misrepresent the source of any Output or the fact that it was generated by artificial intelligence,” and must “clearly cite the Services” when publishing Output. Why it matters: two separate disclosure duties — say where the content came from, and credit Perplexity — matching the same pattern in Perplexity’s own Acceptable Use Policy.
Regulatory & Research Context
Perplexity falls outside the provider sets directly examined by Davidson et al. (2026) and Pandit et al. (2026), but Pandit et al.’s framing of GenAI terms as creating a “significant imbalance of power” applies by analogy to this page’s “major finding”: the input license clause’s fully-stacked “royalty free, transferable, sub-licensable, worldwide and irrevocable” grant over Content, paired with a feedback clause that is a full rights assignment rather than a license. Edwards et al. (2025) would describe this combination as characteristic of the “platformisation paradigm,” in which a consumer-facing AI search product adopts content-licensing terms structurally closer to a social-media platform’s than to the narrower training-specific grants typical of other chat-AI providers in this dataset.
Changes Summary
| Date | What changed |
|---|---|
| 2025-11-11 | Baseline version (“Last updated: June 4th, 2024”). |
| 2026-01-24 | Genuine but non-AI-related addition: a new §2.5 “Free Trials” clause. Cosmetic-only changes elsewhere (capitalization, a trailing semicolon). No change to Input/Output, Feedback, or Content-license clauses. |
Version History
2025-11-11
- Explicit AI clause: YES
- Non-explicit predatory: YES
- Flagged keywords:
input license,feedback,ai disclosure
Clause: input license
In order to operate the Service, we must obtain from you certain license rights in Your Content so that actions we take in operating the Service are not considered legal violations. Accordingly, by using the Service and uploading Your Content, you grant us a license to access, use, host, cache, store, reproduce, transmit, display, publish, distribute, and modify Your Content to operate, improve, promote and provide the Services, including to reproduce, transmit, display, publish and distribute Output based on your Input. You agree that these rights and licenses are royalty free, transferable, sub-licensable, worldwide and irrevocable (for so long as Your Content is stored with us)…
Clause: feedback
Ownership of Feedback. We welcome feedback, comments and suggestions for improvements to the Services (“Feedback”). You acknowledge and expressly agree that any contribution of Feedback does not and will not give or grant you any right, title or interest in the Services or in any such Feedback. All Feedback becomes the sole and exclusive property of the Company, and the Company may use and disclose Feedback in any manner and for any purpose whatsoever without further notice or compensation to you… You hereby assign to the Company any and all right, title and interest… that you may have in and to any and all Feedback.
Clause: ai disclosure
You may not (i) publish any Output generated by the Services without clearly citing the Services, or (ii) misrepresent the source of any Output or the fact that it was generated by artificial intelligence.
2026-01-24
All flagged clauses unchanged from 2025-11-11. A new, non-AI-related §2.5 “Free Trials” clause was added; otherwise changes were cosmetic only.